Dave, I concur with Paul. The authors and the co-chairs have been working with the ADs to address these issues. We have several emails discussion on the drafts. Any non-editorial changes (e.g. the bidi & unicode 3.2) was and will be bought to the group again.
The feeling I get from these discussion is that IESG is trying its best to make sure the document got things right, rather then finding faults with the draft. -James Seng ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Crocker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Paul Hoffman / IMC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2002 2:07 AM Subject: Re: [idn] Document Status? > At 10:38 AM 8/30/2002 -0700, Paul Hoffman / IMC wrote: > >The sky is not falling, Dave. > >A new draft that we believe meets the IESG's request for clarifications > >has already been turned into the Internet Drafts repository but has not > >been announced by the IETF Secretariat yet. > > > Paul, it would be far more helpful to see responses to the particulars, > rather than this sort of dismissive, handwaving condescension. > > It is absolutely fine for my concerns to be unwarranted. > > What is not fine is the continuing failure to address those concerns, with > explanations that make clear why they are not warranted. > > d/ > > > ---------- > Dave Crocker <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > TribalWise, Inc. <http://www.tribalwise.com> > tel +1.408.246.8253; fax +1.408.850.1850 > > >
