On Tuesday, May 12, 2020 2:14:11 PM EDT Alessandro Vesely wrote: > On Tue 12/May/2020 19:09:55 +0200 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 9:30 AM Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> wrote: > >> On Tue 12/May/2020 17:48:38 +0200 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > >>> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 1:20 AM Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> wrote: > >>>> On Mon 11/May/2020 20:23:12 +0200 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > >>>>> Indeed; why would I believe what any given domain claims in this tag? > >>>> > >>>> If you trust the domain, you can as well trust their tagging. > >>> > >>> If you trust the domain, you don't need their tagging. > >> > >> Why not? I may trust gmail, say. Yet, in order to learn what > >> restrictions they apply to the From: I have to create an account and try. > >> There is no standard location where they declare their policy in a > >> machine-readable manner, and policies written in legalese are even less > >> readable...>> > > > > What would you do with that information if you had it? > > I think I'd copy it to comments in the corresponding A-R header field. That > would make A-R stanzas more eloquent.
Personally, more eloquent header fields aren't a priority. I'm confident that if there were somehow standardized, I wouldn't implement it. Scott K _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list Ietf-dkim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
