On 14/11/22 08:26, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Is compatibility with DKIM sufficient for the charter or should there be broader language about compatibility with existing email architecture? I'm inclined to say "Yes", but I'm unsure about wording.
+1
Similarly, at least one of them could lead to normal indirect mail flows being identified as replay attacks. Is something specific needed about being compatible with existing email deployments more generally (beyond DKIM deployment compatibility) needed? Once agian, I'd say "Yes", but am not sure how to word it.
+1 - Roland _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list Ietf-dkim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
