On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 7:23 PM Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 2:12 PM Michael Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Also: the date on the problem statement seems awfully aggressive. My >> thinking is that the problem statement should at least discuss (as is >> mentioned in the charter) how "replays" are completely legitimate uses >> of DKIM, and thus limit the solution space to not break those uses. >> > > Milestones are negotiable, and the one(s) I used for this are largely dart > throws. We can change them to be something more practical once chairs have > been secured. > We can move up discussing the problem statement document if it hinders chartering. I've been working on that document and can push out a new draft soon. -Wei > > -MSK > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf-dkim mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
