> On 24 Mar 2023, at 18:14, Scott Kitterman <ietf-d...@kitterman.com> wrote: > > > > On March 24, 2023 5:42:41 PM UTC, Michael Thomas <m...@mtcc.com> wrote: >> >> On 3/24/23 10:22 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >>> >>> >>> Fine with me, it's far from a showstopper overall. I just made the >>> suggestion. >>> >> This wg should be concerned with DKIM problems, not other wg problems and >> especially for experimental rfc's of dubious value and complete mysteries as >> to what they have to do with their actual charter. > > As long as you include integration of DKIM into the overall email > architecture and broader impacts of DKIM changes as part of 'concerned with > DKIM problems', I agree.
I agree with this. We do, I think, need to acknowledge that DKIM is part of a complicated landscape of authentication protocols that are independent and interdependent. laura (participating) -- The Delivery Experts Laura Atkins Word to the Wise la...@wordtothewise.com Email Delivery Blog: http://wordtothewise.com/blog
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list Ietf-dkim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
