On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 8:21 PM Jesse Thompson <z...@fastmail.com> wrote:
> > As you cited, RFC 5322 describes three ways that the "Bcc" field is > typically used. You're talking about just one of those, and I'm not sure > it's the most common one. In any case, I suggest that "should" is a bit of > a leap, especially given that the choice of which of the three to use is > described as "implementation dependent". > > The second part of your citation confirms the risk to which I was > referring. > > > I don't understand why it's a privacy issue that an individual recipient > sees their own address in the Bcc header. > It isn't. But that's not what DARA is proposing, and that's what I was replying to. And "Bcc" can have many values under the first of the three models in RFC 5322. -MSK
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list Ietf-dkim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
