Hi, > On May 19, 2024, at 7:22 PM, Dave Crocker <d...@dcrocker.net> wrote: > > On 5/10/2024 2:33 PM, Dave Crocker wrote: >> On 5/10/2024 10:54 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >>> * Prior to accepting any Standards Track document for development, there >>> must >>> be a commitment to implement the resulting proposed standard from at least >>> two independent parties, as recorded on a related IETF mailing list.
To further Dave’s points, “implementation” is not the same as deploying it operationally at scale. That would be a significant commitment for someone to make. Bob > Just realized this concern did not get attention: > > Simply put this is a thoroughly unreasonable burden. > > Companies don't work that way. > > Companies do not make public, future commitments for implementing standards. > And when there are attempts to get them to, they waffle and evade. > > Also, I believe, the IETF has wisely never tried to impose this burden. > > Again, if the goal is to limit this working group to only take on > specifications that are already in use, then just say that. It's simpler, > clearer, more direct and, frankly, more pragmatic. > > Because that is the practical effect of what's in the charter. > > d/ > > -- > Dave Crocker > Brandenburg InternetWorking > bbiw.net > mast:@dcrocker@mastodon.social <mailto:mast:@dcrocker@mastodon.social>
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- ietf-dkim@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ietf-dkim-le...@ietf.org
