On 6/2/2025 3:08 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
On 01/06/2025 22:28, Dave Crocker wrote:
On 6/1/2025 4:58 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
Basically, we can assume that all To:/Cc: addresses are legit, since
that's what the author intended.
2. Having multiple things to check for is more complicated than one.
Creating the extra field is trivial on the posting side.
The loop is based on local data.
I don't understand what that means.
It is definitely easier than looking up the same key multiple times
(in case multiple recipients are on the same MX.)
DKOR adds no signatures.
And its requirement for one addressee per message is not special to DKOR.
Conversely, depending on the MTA filtering API, splitting messages may
require some acrobatics, like removing recipients and re-injecting the
message anew.
No. It does not.
I think you are assuming much more complex functional requirements than
DKOR has specified.
A good recap is this message by Wei:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-dkim/1NoBJCqu34_069P_EZe_i1AWzxA/
Tha nks.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
bluesky: @dcrocker.bsky.social
mast: @[email protected]
_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
