It appears that Alessandro Vesely  <[email protected]> said:
>> Is that a thing?  A message with multiple "From"?
>>
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6854.html

We beat this to death a few years ago. While it is possible to put two addresses
in the From header, it is very uncommon, it is even less common to have two
addreses in different domains, and the few examples I've seen are either
mistakes or malicious. They are rare enough we can ignore them, messages with
multiple From header domains can't be DKIM2 signed.

>Wei convinced me that there must be at most one rt=, because, he said, the 
>official recipients, To: and Cc:, do not need to be repeated in rt=.  They are 
>already signed and delivery to them is due.  rt= is only needed for Bcc: and 
>forwards (which can be thought of as Bcc:).  This way, there must be at most 
>one rt=, but there may be none.

By far the most common scenario where the recipient isn't in the header is 
mailing lists.

There will always be exactly one rt= because we don't allow more than one, and 
a mail
delivery without an envelope recipient isn't a mail delivery.

R's,
John

_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to