On Thu 17/Jul/2025 15:27:53 +0200 John R Levine wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2025, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
Or we could slice it the other way as I suggested a few messages back,
However, what about:
... s=sel; ab=alg1:hash1, alg2:hash2, alg3:hash3 ...?
The header parser only handles a list of k=val, so no.
k=val1, val2, val3; doesn't seem to be so arduous to parse, considering that
for DKIM2 there's going to be new signing and verification libraries...
Best
Ale
--
_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
