On Fri, 18 Jul 2025, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
... s=sel; ab=alg1:hash1, alg2:hash2, alg3:hash3 ...?
The header parser only handles a list of k=val, so no.
k=val1, val2, val3; doesn't seem to be so arduous to parse, considering that
for DKIM2 there's going to be new signing and verification libraries...
Sure, in principle we can program anything. But in this case, we know how
to write this in ways that we can already parse.
Let's see what other people think.
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
