Hello, please let me try it again with that unsubscribed address.

It is the 50th anniversary of that "Saturday Night Live" that
i never watched myself, but have heard of a lot.
So .. i thought that fits pretty well.  We had other TV events.

Also it is, local time now, the 65th anniversary of Khrushchev
pounding his desk with shoe during a speech to the UN.
Any similarities are purely by chance.

Not to mention the anniversaries of Dennis Ritchie's death, and
founding of the Jimy Hendrix Experience, but now we are getting
off-topic, electric lady land.

[email protected] wrote in
 <176022374750.324942.4338431218451859522@dt-datatracker-84f8f646b-tg6mn>:
 ...

Another iteration of "the other option" that is DKIMv1, and
neither deep track nor rubbish protecting (i just had, this
evening, a message with several IronPort and whatnot things in it,
i guess they would not protect that themselves -- Microsoft surely
does not protect most of their headers, surely consciously;
especially the largest, like all sorts of
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info etc; having said that, their
DKIM setup from communication.microsoft.com protects a "messageid"
header that noone ever has heard of, so that is that -- shall
anyone listen).

This iteration basically completes the mitigation approach, talks
on i= and key rotation, especially in conjunction with "I"nternal
signatures.  It also changes "xz" to "lzma2" to satisfy Lasse
Collin's clarifying remarks -- it is a longer word, though.

 |Name:     draft-nurpmeso-dkim-access-control-diff-changes
 |Revision: 09
 |Title:    DKIM Access Control and Differential Changes
 |Date:     2025-10-11
 |Group:    dkim
 |Pages:    28
 |URL:      https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-nurpmeso-dkim-access-con\
 |trol-diff-changes-09.txt
 |Status:   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nurpmeso-dkim-access-co\
 |ntrol-diff-changes/
 |HTML:     https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-nurpmeso-dkim-access-con\
 |trol-diff-changes-09.html
 |HTMLized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-nurpmeso-dkim-acce\
 |ss-control-diff-changes
 |Diff:     https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-nurpmeso-dkim-\
 |access-control-diff-changes-09

I pesonally am still thinking "legal things" that you say do not
matter.  Ie, MIMEDefang cutting off "spam" of all sort, but also
turning public long time storage SMTP envelope data.
Just saying.

Cheerio, Miss Sophie!
And greetings from Germany.

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,                The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter           he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)

_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to