On Fri, Oct 16, 2026 at 1:41 PM Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> wrote:
> Colleagues, > > We have an interim next week (Wednesday afternoon Pacific), but we > have yet to post an agenda that says more than "TBD". Therefore, > please submit topics and requests for air time. In particular, > Richard, we would appreciate it if you would assemble a list of open > topics. > > Similarly, since IETF 127 is about a month away, we will also need an > agenda for that meeting. We can use "TBD" for the agenda until the > interim, but the call is now open for topics we should ensure we > discuss in person (if the interim doesn't resolve them). > > Are we converging on the WGLC being ready for the base document? We > could start it, say, between the interim and the in-person meeting. > We could start early directorate reviews now. > > Do we believe that the keys/DNS document is also close? I think so. There's a -01 in the chairs' review queue that contains RSA key format errata updates. There's an in progress -02 that will contain algorithm string changes adding a PQC algorithm name with a matching change in the spec document. That draft should be submitted before the interim. -Wei > It's pretty > clear that the base document depends on it, so we should discuss > sequencing here. > > Let's go! > > -MSK, for the Chairs > _______________________________________________ > Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
