-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In message <[email protected]
il.com>, Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> writes

>What agenda items do people have for 127, other than the following?
>
>* Administrivia (chairs)
>* draft-ietf-dkim-dkim2-spec (Richard)
>* draft-ietf-dkim-dkim2-dns (Wei)
>* AOB (TBD)

draft-clayton-dkim-canmodify-00

   which is intended to spark a discussion on whether or not there any
   "safe" modifications and whether shading "donotmodify" down a bit has
   any practical value.

>FYI, the chairs think we should aim to start WGLC on the "spec"
>document after we meet in San Francisco, though if there are still
>significant open issues we can of course defer that.

Note that the current version of the keys document is pretty final IMO
though there has been limited discussion of how it impacts DKIM1 (though
that may be because no-one is setting those fields anyway [perhaps those
who large collections of key records might like to have a look])

- -- 
richard @ highwayman . com                       "Nothing seems the same
                          Still you never see the change from day to day
                                And no-one notices the customs slip away"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1

iQA/AwUBavKOJGHfC/FfW545EQLLoACeJVYSO5B052CQxBxUBwvPb0VJtoAAn1iy
CfQb0A8bq9BiiEMAPq99bXvp
=bz/Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to