It appears that MCN-IETF <[email protected]> said: >Should the RFC5322.From domain owner have some authority over which >modifications can be made >while retaining its authenticated identity?
See other discussions where we have a "nomodify" flag, no modifications allowed at all. I do not think we can describe more complex "this modification is OK but that isn't" rules. I also have very little sympathy for senders trying to tell recipients what to do. I can see a nomodify flag saying this isn't a message that we expect to go through mailing lists but that's about it. Keep in mind that recipients always get to make the final decision. For example, I can imagine a situation where you get a message with a "nomodify" flag but some small change, and you have a local rule that allows that change by that relay because you have reasons to believe they're benign. DKIM2 won't say anything about it, since it's local policy. R's, John _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
