On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 09:53:52AM +0000, Stephen Farrell allegedly wrote: > > Section 3.3.3 includes 512 bit rsa as a MUST. I think that that > might be an error. Is there really any need for anything smaller > than 1024 in any case?
It might not be significant, but I presume there are deployed 512 DomainKey Selectors, excluding 512 from DKIM would break those deployments. We *could* deprecated that size by saying verifiers MUST and signers MAY if the consensus is that 512 should not be used henceforth. Mark. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
