However we have so far preserved the ability of a pre-IETF signer to
work with a post-IETF DKIM verifier. (So, Barry's statement is true,
> but I'm not sure it addressed the concern.
I believe my text, or a reasonable variant of it (modulo Paul's
concerns, for instance) preserves this ability. Do you disagree?
Perhaps, if you do, changing a SHOULD to a MUST would fix that?
Barry
--
Barry Leiba, Pervasive Computing Technology ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.research.ibm.com/people/l/leiba
http://www.research.ibm.com/spam
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
