You believe both and apply a receiver policy determined by yourself that will handle a message with an anomaly,
Bill Oxley Messaging Engineer Cox Communications, Inc. Alpharetta GA 404-847-6397 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John L Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 9:43 AM To: william(at)elan.net Cc: DKIM List Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing > The statement that I sign only my own mail makes perfect sense. If I have a message with your valid 3rd party signature, meaning that you've published the key, and your SSP says you sign only your own mail, which do I believe? Why or why not? Regards, John Levine, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://johnlevine.com, Mayor "I dropped the toothpaste", said Tom, crestfallenly. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
