John Levine wrote: > This lack of consensus on SSP semantics tells me that attempts to > standardize it are extremely premature. The ASRG is down the hall and > would be thrilled if people wanted to do some experiments and collect > some data to see what the level of signature breakage really is so > they can come back later with rough consensus and running code. > The recent discussion on the list has rambled a great deal, and involved a relatively small number of people, and mostly under the misleading subject line "user level ssp" (which to your credit you changed when making the above comment). Judging this as lack of consensus strikes me as extremely premature.
-Jim _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
