On Mar 4, 2007, at 5:56 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
This isn't a debating society. Please don't continue to try drag us
back to arguments that were settled months ago. (You're not the
only one, but the above paragraph is a very good example;-)
One aspect in reference was the impact of EAI, which was never fully
discussed, nor has there ever been a conclusion reached regarding
message replay. John's conclusion was that the only issue facing
DKIM is whether a signature can be verified. This indeed overlooks
areas this WG intentionally ignored. A deprecation scheme simply
permits a graceful transition should experience prove ignoring these
concerns was in error. Too many wish to equate DKIM message signing
reliability as being synonymous with the underlying cryptography; it
is not.
-Doug
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
