Mike,
I agree we can't force people to read the spec. But given that many
of us read the spec and didn't notice this point, I think it's worth
highlighting for those who do actually read it.
eric
--On March 8, 2007 11:21:20 AM -0800 Michael Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Not to be too jaded, but does anybody think this will have any
practical
effect whatsoever? I would lay long odds that whoever put that key
into
their DNS didn't read the DKIM spec -- or at least read it with
kind of
critical eye.
What would actually be better here, IMO, is to find out _how_ this
happened. That is, is this a pathological case for a DNS server we
ought to care about. If this just a random one off misconfiguration,
I'm not sure what the point is for introducing more text with its
inherent potential of itself being misconstrued...
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
