> > What would actually be better here, IMO, is to find out _how_ this > > happened. That is, is this a pathological case for a DNS server we > > ought to care about.
A bit of experimenting with BIND and reading the zone file syntax in rfc1035 can explain what probably happened. All entries below are syntactically correct as far as the zone syntax and DNS is concerned. right._domainkey TXT ("k=rsa; p=MIG" "MAG0udE82Yzb7" "xLv4QnQIDAQAB") wrong._domainkey TXT "k=rsa; p=MIG\ MAG0udE82Yzb7\ xLv4QnQIDAQAB" wrong2._domainkey TXT "k=rsa; p=MIG\013\010MAG0udE82Yzb7xLv4QnQIDAQAB" Mark _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html