On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 03:48:36AM -0000, John Levine wrote: > >It would be very useful. Think > > > >d=bigmarketingcompany.com > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >d=bigmarketingcompany.com > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Useful to whom? I have little interest as a mail receiver sorting out > an ESP's different campaigns, and I suspect I'm not alone. (This was > the same fallacy that was behind the failed Project Lumos.) > > You're welcome to put whatever tracking stuff you want into your mail, > but I'm going to maintain one reputation for you regardless of the > stuff.
That is an interesting view. I can accomplish the same by using sub-domains in d= instead. Are you simpy going to strip sub-domains from d= too? It is interesting that receivers (Hotmail/AOL/Yahoo) suggest to senders to separate their different type of mail streams (transactional,marketing,etc) by using IPs. The same can be accomplished with DKIM and i=. I also hadn't realized that DKIM was strictly meant to benefit receivers. -- :: Jeff Macdonald | Director of Messaging Technologies :: e-Dialog | [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: 131 Hartwell Ave. | Lexington, MA 02421 :: v: 781-372-1922 | f: 781-863-8118 :: www.e-dialog.com _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
