On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 11:23:39AM -0400, John L wrote: >>>> d=bigmarketingcompany.com >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >>>> d=bigmarketingcompany.com >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> That is an interesting view. I can accomplish the same by using >> sub-domains in d= instead. Are you simpy going to strip >> sub-domains from d= too? > > Honestly, I'll do whatever seems easiest in my goal to deliver the mail my > users want, which may or may not be the mail you think they want. The best > thing for senders to do, as you note below, is to divide up the mail stream > in ways that make life easier for receivers. > >> It is interesting that receivers (Hotmail/AOL/Yahoo) suggest to senders >> to separate their different type of mail streams >> (transactional,marketing,etc) by using IPs. The same can be >> accomplished with DKIM and i=. > > Indeed, since that makes it easier to handle the ads their users don't care > about differently from the transactions they want. But I can't help but > note that your example above was different clients, not different > categories.
Ah, I see the disconnect. bigmarketingcompany is not the same as ESP. Here's a better example: d=mattel.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] d=mattel.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] d=mattel.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] d=mattel.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- :: Jeff Macdonald | Director of Messaging Technologies :: e-Dialog | [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: 131 Hartwell Ave. | Lexington, MA 02421 :: v: 781-372-1922 | f: 781-863-8118 :: www.e-dialog.com _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
