Dave Crocker wrote: > With the use of language like "suspicious", SSP is making value > judgement on messages that do not satisfy SSP's criteria, even > though those message well might be entirely legitimate.
Weasel words instead of "suspicious" would be an intentional lie. The problem is the "even though", the "first author" concept is utter dubious, unrelated to (2)822(upd), and claims that "first author" is always the same as "originator" would be a perfidy. Frank _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
