-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 9, 2007, at 11:26 PM, Frank Ellermann wrote:
> Dave Crocker wrote:
>
>> With the use of language like "suspicious", SSP is making value
>> judgement on messages that do not satisfy SSP's criteria, even
>> though those message well might be entirely legitimate.
>
> Weasel words instead of "suspicious" would be an intentional lie.
>
> The problem is the "even though", the "first author" concept is
> utter dubious, unrelated to (2)822(upd), and claims that "first
> author" is always the same as "originator" would be a perfidy.
>
How about something like "SSP Exception"? Metaphorically, it works
well with the programming use of the word exception.
Jon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Universal 2.6.3
Charset: US-ASCII
wj8DBQFHXulRsTedWZOD3gYRAlKXAKCuOSXqdpH+v6eeFCdJyuCwhHYi/gCfRFid
3gO8EodZhZAgcbd3JRn8Qbs=
=JqZF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
