MH Michael Hammer (5304) wrote:
You are picking a particular case structured by yourself to say "See,
this check is irrelevent". You ignore any other use cases regardless of
outcome.
Mike,
I think the biggest challenge in discusses this area of standards is to deal
with just this: particular cases. Email is used is so many different ways,
what works for one scenario well might not work for another.
The issue is not that one is right and another wrong, but that doing something
to affect one needs to worry quite a bit about how it affects another.
At a minimum, this is why I've become fond of emphasizing the need to make
explicit statements about the scenarios for which something is applicable.
If the final version of SSP is useful for only a limited set of scenarios --
and I believe most of us expect that -- that's fine, as long as this is clear.
So far, scenarios to which SSP will not work seem to be what has been ignored,
IMO.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html