ietf-dkim
Thread
Date
Earlier messages
Later messages
Messages by Thread
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Key Sizes
Brandon Long
[ietf-dkim] DKIM and EAI
John R. Levine
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM and EAI
Jiankang Yao
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM and EAI
Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM and EAI
John R. Levine
[ietf-dkim] DKIM and EAI
John R. Levine
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM and EAI
Hector Santos
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM and EAI
John R. Levine
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM and EAI
Scott Kitterman
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM and EAI
John Levine
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM and EAI
Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: [ietf-dkim] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6376 (4810)
Stephen Farrell
Re: [ietf-dkim] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6376 (4810)
Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: [ietf-dkim] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6376 (4810)
Dave Crocker
Re: [ietf-dkim] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6376 (4810)
John R Levine
Re: [ietf-dkim] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6376 (4810)
Stephen Farrell
Re: [ietf-dkim] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6376 (4810)
HANSEN, TONY L
Re: [ietf-dkim] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6376 (4810)
John R. Levine
Re: [ietf-dkim] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6376 (4810)
Juan Altmayer Pizzorno
[ietf-dkim] DKIM auth verification FAILs in headers, but PASSes in logs; where the best place to get answers about fixing this?
jasonsu
Re: [ietf-dkim] ietf-dkim Digest, Vol 306, Issue 2
alina dobrescu
[ietf-dkim] ok
Jeffry Busschaert
[ietf-dkim] Fwd: [Lurk] Another outside the "box" use case: DKIM
Stephen Farrell
Re: [ietf-dkim] Fwd: [Lurk] Another outside the "box" use case: DKIM
Dave Crocker
Re: [ietf-dkim] Fwd: [Lurk] Another outside the "box" use case: DKIM
Jon Callas
Re: [ietf-dkim] Fwd: [Lurk] Another outside the "box" use case: DKIM
Dave Crocker
Re: [ietf-dkim] Fwd: [Lurk] Another outside the "box" use case: DKIM
Dave Crocker
[ietf-dkim] DKIM Key Size Constraints
Scott Kitterman
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Key Size Constraints
Douglas Otis
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Key Size Constraints
Scott Kitterman
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Key Size Constraints
Martijn Grooten
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Key Size Constraints
MH Michael Hammer (5304)
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Key Size Constraints
Hector Santos
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Key Size Constraints
Martijn Grooten
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Key Size Constraints
Martijn Grooten
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Key Size Constraints
Hector Santos
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Key Size Constraints
Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Key Size Constraints
Scott Kitterman
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Key Size Constraints
Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Key Size Constraints
Roland Turner
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Key Size Constraints
Hector Santos
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Key Size Constraints
Dave Crocker
[ietf-dkim] DKIM Key Size Reporting Methods
Hector Santos
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Key Size Reporting Methods
Hector Santos
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Key Size Constraints
Scott Kitterman
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Key Size Constraints
Hector Santos
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Key Size Constraints
Roland Turner
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Key Size Constraints
Martijn Grooten
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Key Size Constraints
Alessandro Vesely
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Key Size Constraints
Martijn Grooten
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Key Size Constraints
Hector Santos
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Key Size Constraints
John R. Levine
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Key Size Constraints
A. Schulze
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Key Size Constraints
MH Michael Hammer (5304)
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Key Size Constraints
Hector Santos
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Key Size Constraints
Scott Kitterman
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Key Size Constraints
Hector Santos
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Key Size Constraints
Michael Deutschmann
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Key Size Constraints
Scott Kitterman
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Key Size Constraints
Douglas Otis
Re: [ietf-dkim] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6376 (4287)
Barry Leiba
[ietf-dkim] need for clarification
A. Schulze
Re: [ietf-dkim] need for clarification
Steve Atkins
Re: [ietf-dkim] need for clarification
A. Schulze
Re: [ietf-dkim] need for clarification
Steve Atkins
Re: [ietf-dkim] need for clarification
Franck Martin
Re: [ietf-dkim] need for clarification on key size
John R. Levine
Re: [ietf-dkim] need for clarification on key size
A. Schulze
Re: [ietf-dkim] need for clarification on key size
John R. Levine
Re: [ietf-dkim] need for clarification
Mark Delany
[ietf-dkim] Error in RFC 5321 concerning SPF and DKIM
Dave Crocker
[ietf-dkim] New DKIM canonicalization, was dkim-delegate-00
Alessandro Vesely
[ietf-dkim] European Commision starts Consultation on Technical Specification DomainKeys Identified Mail Signatures (DKIM)
Rolf E. Sonneveld
Re: [ietf-dkim] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6376 (3758)
Barry Leiba
Re: [ietf-dkim] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6376 (3758)
Michael Thomas
Re: [ietf-dkim] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6376 (3758)
Barry Leiba
Re: [ietf-dkim] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6376 (3758)
Barry Leiba
Re: [ietf-dkim] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6376 (3758)
Tony Hansen
Re: [ietf-dkim] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6376 (3758)
Dave Crocker
Re: [ietf-dkim] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6376 (3758)
Tony Hansen
Re: [ietf-dkim] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6376 (3758)
Dave Crocker
Re: [ietf-dkim] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6376 (3758)
Mark Delany
[ietf-dkim] Timeouts retrieving keys from ietf.org
Jim Fenton
Re: [ietf-dkim] Timeouts retrieving keys from ietf.org
John R. Levine
Re: [ietf-dkim] Timeouts retrieving keys from ietf.org
John R. Levine
Re: [ietf-dkim] Timeouts retrieving keys from ietf.org
Jim Fenton
Re: [ietf-dkim] Timeouts retrieving keys from ietf.org
John Levine
Re: [ietf-dkim] Timeouts retrieving keys from ietf.org
SM
[ietf-dkim] Fwd: Request to move RFC 5617 (ADSP) to Historic
Dave Crocker
Re: [ietf-dkim] [apps-discuss] Fwd: Request to move RFC 5617 (ADSP) to Historic
Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: [ietf-dkim] [apps-discuss] Fwd: Request to move RFC 5617 (ADSP) to Historic
Michael Thomas
Re: [ietf-dkim] [apps-discuss] Fwd: Request to move RFC 5617 (ADSP) to Historic
MH Michael Hammer (5304)
Re: [ietf-dkim] [apps-discuss] Fwd: Request to move RFC 5617 (ADSP) to Historic
Michael Thomas
Re: [ietf-dkim] [apps-discuss] Fwd: Request to move RFC 5617 (ADSP) to Historic
Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: [ietf-dkim] [apps-discuss] Fwd: Request to move RFC 5617 (ADSP) to Historic
Michael Thomas
Re: [ietf-dkim] [apps-discuss] Fwd: Request to move RFC 5617 (ADSP) to Historic
Dave Crocker
Re: [ietf-dkim] [apps-discuss] Fwd: Request to move RFC 5617 (ADSP) to Historic
Michael Thomas
Re: [ietf-dkim] [apps-discuss] Fwd: Request to move RFC 5617 (ADSP) to Historic
Barry Leiba
Re: [ietf-dkim] [apps-discuss] Fwd: Request to move RFC 5617 (ADSP) to Historic
Barry Leiba
Re: [ietf-dkim] [apps-discuss] Fwd: Request to move RFC 5617 (ADSP) to Historic
John Levine
Re: [ietf-dkim] Fwd: Request to move RFC 5617 (ADSP) to Historic
Hector Santos
Re: [ietf-dkim] [apps-discuss] Fwd: Request to move RFC 5617 (ADSP) to Historic
Tony Hansen
Re: [ietf-dkim] [apps-discuss] Fwd: Request to move RFC 5617 (ADSP) to Historic
Eliot Lear
Re: [ietf-dkim] Fwd: Request to move RFC 5617 (ADSP) to Historic
Jim Fenton
Re: [ietf-dkim] Fwd: Request to move RFC 5617 (ADSP) to Historic
Dave Crocker
Re: [ietf-dkim] Fwd: Request to move RFC 5617 (ADSP) to Historic
Hector Santos
Re: [ietf-dkim] Fwd: Request to move RFC 5617 (ADSP) to Historic
Jim Fenton
Re: [ietf-dkim] Fwd: Request to move RFC 5617 (ADSP) to Historic
John Levine
Re: [ietf-dkim] IPR Disclosure: ENTERKHAN CO., LTD's Statement about IPR related to RFC 6376, draft-allman-dkim-base-01, and Creative Commons
Stephen Farrell
Re: [ietf-dkim] IPR Disclosure: ENTERKHAN CO., LTD's Statement about IPR related to RFC 6376, draft-allman-dkim-base-01, and Creative Commons
Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: [ietf-dkim] IPR Disclosure: ENTERKHAN CO., LTD's Statement about IPR related to RFC 6376, draft-allman-dkim-base-01, and Creative Commons
John R. Levine
Re: [ietf-dkim] That weird i= is most probably EDSP
Michael Deutschmann
Re: [ietf-dkim] That weird i= is most probably EDSP
John Levine
[ietf-dkim] Seeking Clarification of the l= Tag
henry+d...@unlocktheinbox.com
Re: [ietf-dkim] Seeking Clarification of the l= Tag
Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: [ietf-dkim] Seeking Clarification of the l= Tag
Pawel Lesnikowski
Re: [ietf-dkim] Seeking Clarification of the l= Tag
Hector Santos
Re: [ietf-dkim] Seeking Clarification of the l= Tag
Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: [ietf-dkim] STD 76, RFC 6376 on DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures
Dave Crocker
[ietf-dkim] Weird i= in client mail
Laura Atkins
Re: [ietf-dkim] Weird i= in client mail
Dave Crocker
Re: [ietf-dkim] Weird i= in client mail
Laura Atkins
Re: [ietf-dkim] Weird i= in client mail
John Levine
Re: [ietf-dkim] Weird i= in client mail
John Levine
Re: [ietf-dkim] Weird i= in client mail
Franck Martin
Re: [ietf-dkim] Weird i= in client mail
John Levine
Re: [ietf-dkim] Weird i= in client mail
Franck Martin
Re: [ietf-dkim] Weird i= in client mail
Dave Crocker
Re: [ietf-dkim] Weird i= in client mail
Tony Hansen
[ietf-dkim] value-added DKIM-ish enhancements )was - Re: Weird i= in client mail)
Dave Crocker
Re: [ietf-dkim] value-added DKIM-ish enhancements )was - Re: Weird i= in client mail)
Franck Martin
Re: [ietf-dkim] value-added DKIM-ish enhancements )was - Re: Weird i= in client mail)
Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: [ietf-dkim] value-added DKIM-ish enhancements )was - Re: Weird i= in client mail)
Tony Hansen
Re: [ietf-dkim] value-added DKIM-ish enhancements )was - Re: Weird i= in client mail)
Douglas Otis
[ietf-dkim] The problem with the DKIM design community
Michael Deutschmann
Re: [ietf-dkim] The problem with the DKIM design community
Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: [ietf-dkim] The problem with the DKIM design community
Franck Martin
Re: [ietf-dkim] The problem with the DKIM design community
Hector Santos
Re: [ietf-dkim] The problem with the DKIM design community
John R. Levine
Re: [ietf-dkim] The problem with the DKIM design community
Michael Deutschmann
Re: [ietf-dkim] The problem with the DKIM design community
John R. Levine
Re: [ietf-dkim] The problem with the DKIM design community
Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: [ietf-dkim] The problem with the DKIM design community
Alessandro Vesely
Re: [ietf-dkim] The problem with the DKIM design community
Michael Deutschmann
Re: [ietf-dkim] That weird i= is most probably EDSP
Alessandro Vesely
Re: [ietf-dkim] That weird i= is most probably EDSP
Michael Deutschmann
Re: [ietf-dkim] That weird i= is most probably EDSP
Alessandro Vesely
Re: [ietf-dkim] That weird i= is most probably EDSP
Michael Deutschmann
Re: [ietf-dkim] That weird i= is most probably EDSP
Michael Deutschmann
Re: [ietf-dkim] That weird i= is most probably EDSP
Douglas Otis
Re: [ietf-dkim] That weird i= is most probably EDSP
John R. Levine
Re: [ietf-dkim] That weird i= is most probably EDSP
Michael Deutschmann
Re: [ietf-dkim] That weird i= is most probably EDSP
Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: [ietf-dkim] That weird i= is most probably EDSP
John Levine
Re: [ietf-dkim] The problem with the DKIM design community
Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: [ietf-dkim] The problem with the DKIM design community
Hector Santos
Re: [ietf-dkim] The problem with the DKIM design community
Douglas Otis
Re: [ietf-dkim] value-added DKIM-ish enhancements )was - Re: Weird i= in client mail)
Douglas Otis
Re: [ietf-dkim] Weird i= in client mail
Michael Thomas
Re: [ietf-dkim] Weird i= in client mail
Jon Callas
Re: [ietf-dkim] Weird i= in client mail
John R. Levine
Re: [ietf-dkim] Weird i= in client mail
Rolf E. Sonneveld
Re: [ietf-dkim] Weird i= in client mail
Wietse Venema
Re: [ietf-dkim] Weird i= in client mail
Rolf E. Sonneveld
Re: [ietf-dkim] Weird i= in client mail
Wietse Venema
Re: [ietf-dkim] Weird i= in client mail
Rolf E. Sonneveld
Re: [ietf-dkim] Weird i= in client mail
Jon Callas
Re: [ietf-dkim] Weird i= in client mail
Dave Crocker
Re: [ietf-dkim] Weird i= in client mail
John Levine
Re: [ietf-dkim] Weird i= in client mail
Douglas Otis
Re: [ietf-dkim] Weird i= in client mail
Hector Santos
[ietf-dkim] Protocol Action: DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures to Internet Standard
The IESG
[ietf-dkim] DKIM promotion to Internet Standard status
Hector Santos
[ietf-dkim] Sean Turner's Yes on status-change-dkim-to-internetstandard-03: (with COMMENT)
Sean Turner
[ietf-dkim] Stephen Farrell's Yes on status-change-dkim-to-internetstandard-03: (with COMMENT)
Stephen Farrell
[ietf-dkim] Support for DKIM to become an Internet Standard
Franck Martin
[ietf-dkim] Last Call: Change the status of DKIM (RFC 6376) to Internet Standard
The IESG
[ietf-dkim] DMARC working group charter proposal
Murray S. Kucherawy
[ietf-dkim] Authentication-Results
Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: [ietf-dkim] Authentication-Results
Hector Santos
Re: [ietf-dkim] "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"
Eliot Lear
[ietf-dkim] The good ol' "t=" tag in key records
Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: [ietf-dkim] The good ol' "t=" tag in key records
John R. Levine
Re: [ietf-dkim] The good ol' "t=" tag in key records
Hector Santos
Re: [ietf-dkim] The good ol' "t=" tag in key records
Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: [ietf-dkim] The good ol' "t=" tag in key records
Hector Santos
Re: [ietf-dkim] The good ol' "t=" tag in key records
Barry Leiba
Re: [ietf-dkim] The good ol' "t=" tag in key records
Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: [ietf-dkim] The good ol' "t=" tag in key records
Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: [ietf-dkim] The good ol' "t=" tag in key records
Barry Leiba
Re: [ietf-dkim] The good ol' "t=" tag in key records
Hector Santos
Re: [ietf-dkim] The good ol' "t=" tag in key records
Michael Thomas
Re: [ietf-dkim] The good ol' "t=" tag in key records
Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: [ietf-dkim] The good ol' "t=" tag in key records
Michael Thomas
Re: [ietf-dkim] The good ol' "t=" tag in key records
Dave Crocker
Re: [ietf-dkim] The good ol' "t=" tag in key records
Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: [ietf-dkim] The good ol' "t=" tag in key records
Hector Santos
Re: [ietf-dkim] The good ol' "t=" tag in key records
Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: [ietf-dkim] The good ol' "t=" tag in key records
Dave Crocker
[ietf-dkim] Is TLS-OBC for SMTP (in theory) a good alternative to SPF?
Chris Lamont Mankowski
Earlier messages
Later messages