J D Falk wrote: >> Here's core question with this sort of overview: It can include too >> much tutorial about basic technology, rather than focusing on the >> specifics of the technology it is meant to describe. Some pedagogy is >> needed, but how much? > > I've been noticing that data integrity (much better term, thanks) is > often forgotten when discussing DKIM, yet it's clearly very important to > some senders. Section 2 is basically "what will DKIM do for me?" -- so > I think it should be included there.
point taken. does anyone object to the proposed change? d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
