Jim Fenton wrote: >> At best, the benefit of having s= defined now depends on whether >> people are setting s=email now. Are they? Should they? How will >> they know? > > Are they: I haven't seen a key with s=email yet, although I'll have > to admit that I don't look at a lot of selectors.
I have. Also s=mail, s=mx, s=mta23, s=domainkeys, and other strings that our more-or-less human brains might want to interpret as carrying additional meaning. I haven't, however, seen any indication that those strings were chosen with the intention of also having s=usenet, s=rss, s=sip, s=antidisestablishmentarianism, or other indicators that a specific selector would be used solely for non-email purposes. -- J.D. Falk Receiver Products Return Path _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
