In some of my talks, I sometimes refer to DKIM as "DomainKeys Version
2". This gets people thinking in the right frame of mind as to their
relationship.
Tony Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> Sorry, I wasn't done yet.
>
> The main reason I wanted to share this with the working group is to point
> out that we got some confused people at RSA asking us why we're going with
> DKIM and not DomainKeys in light of the content of this paper.
>
> I wonder if it would be prudent to (somehow) make a statement clarifying
> that the experiment therein described was begun before RFC4871 was issued,
> and thus before DKIM enjoyed any kind of real deployment. Or something
> like that. Ideally that would come from PayPal but I don't know that we
> have any direct participation from them here.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
