Tony Hansen wrote: > In some of my talks, I sometimes refer to DKIM as "DomainKeys Version > 2". This gets people thinking in the right frame of mind as to their > relationship.
Yep, this seems to always make things clearer (though I call it version 3.) What hasn't been mentioned yet in this thread is that it wasn't entirely Paypal's choice to use DomainKeys rather than DKIM; Yahoo! is still (as of recent statements) only checking DomainKeys, though they plan to add DKIM support real soon now. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
