Folks, G'day.
The latest version of: RFC 4871 DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures -- Errata draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-02 <http://dkim.org/ietf-dkim.htm#errata> was posted 8 days ago. A competing proposal was posted 2 days ago. On reviewing the list activity, concerning the the contents of rfc4871-errata-02, I've seen: * Some debate about a vocabulary choice that appears to be have converged on retaining the current usage and definition * One posting noting some minor typos that can be fixed for the released version * Some requests for progressing the current draft. Concerning the alternative proposal, I've seen only one posting in its favor. Consequently, I'd like to ask that we go through a working group Last Call for rfc4871-errata-02. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html