Eliot Lear wrote: > You've seen several votes for the alternate, but in any case Jim has > offered alternate language, which i am inclined to accept. I would be > happy to proceed, however, with a poll on the process, if you would like.
1. Jim sent the only posting that I read as simple, direct support. 2. My request was for +1/-1 postings on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-02, not a request for a multi-stage sequence starting with meta-questions about process. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
