Jim Fenton wrote: > Dave CROCKER wrote: >> Are there other changes to draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata being proposed? >> > > I believe the Chairs requested that the other, non-controversial, errata > be incorporated into this draft.
I think we suggested it as an option rather than requested. > Is that (editorial) work ongoing? I think it'd be great if Dave were willing to do that, but I could understand if he'd rather not. S. > > -Jim > > _______________________________________________ > NOTE WELL: This list operates according to > http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html > _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
