> OK, now I'm confused. Can someone define IETF rough consensus? The errata had > a 2/3 majority after the last round of discussion... does the IETF ever get a > better > consensus than that?
Pasi's point is that what you're quoting is from the DKIM working group only, and, at that, only from some 20 participants or so. There are a lot more people who participate in the IETF, and the normal process of review by the IESG and IETF last call provides the opportunity for many more people to review and comment on the document. Barry _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html