There remains some disagreement on whether the "informative note" contained in the last paragraph of the text I proposed on March 27 should appear in the ADSP draft. The note said:
> Informative Note: ADSP is incompatible with DKIM signing by parent > domains described in section 3.8 of [RFC4871] in which a signer uses > "i=" to assert that a parent domain is signing for a subdomain. > This would replace the Note in draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-09, section 2.7. Thus far, I feel it should be included and John Levine and Dave Crocker feel it shouldn't. May we have guidance from others in the Working Group, please? -Jim _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
