On Aug 3, 2009, at 10:31 AM, Douglas Otis wrote: > On 8/2/09 1:06 AM, Mark Delany wrote: >> On Aug 1, 2009, at 9:14 PM, Franck Martin wrote: >> >>> But is ICANN supposed to clean all these random valid domains? >> >> You half-joke, but one of the arguments we presented to the FTC >> back in >> 2003 or so regarding spam was that we had an opportunity to regulate >> issuance of domain names. If not regulate, then at least insist on an >> identifiable legal entity being required to register a domain. > > Rather than viewing control of a domain as indicative of good email > behavior, positive reputations based upon histories of DKIM > signatures could offer an alternative or enhancement to methods > currently used in the disposition of messages. >
That's entirely orthogonal and nothing new. My point was something stronger and different from "reputation", namely something jurisdictional; can I find (and sue) the owner of the domain on the DKIM signature? Mark. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
