In light of the comments by Bill Oxley and my belief that the ability of a domain to designate signing by a specified 3rd party is useful, I'd like to see this included in the update. I believe this would be useful for ISPs as well as ESPs. I don't have any specific wording or proposals on this.
Michael Hammer - mham...@ag.com Web Operations Security AG Interactive/americangreetings.com > -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim- > boun...@mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Farrell > Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 5:44 AM > To: IETF DKIM WG > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal > > > Folks, > > To make life a little easier for us all, (well, mainly Barry > and I:-), could you please keep this thread to discussion of > the proposed charter update. > > And where you've thoughts on that, specific alternate > text would be appreciated. > > Thanks, > Stephen. > > PS: I see John L. has done the right thing and changed > the subject line, maybe reply to that if that's what you > want to chat about. > > > _______________________________________________ > NOTE WELL: This list operates according to > http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
