I do not see where is the issue? I 3rd party sign emails and I have not faced any problems with that (Am I missing something?) The providers that check DKIM all include a dkim=pass in the mail headers.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Oxley" <bill.ox...@cox.com> To: barryle...@computer.org Cc: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org Sent: Saturday, 3 October, 2009 2:56:44 PM GMT +12:00 Fiji Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal while I have enjoyed participasting in this WG I would like to discuss the ability of an ISP to sign on behalf of an entity that we provide all services for. This has generated disinclination in the past but as a provider who has an expressed interest in providing 3rd party signatures we need a set of rules/ideas that states I signed this message on the behalf of foo.examplemy.client.com. Otherwise DKIM is interesting as an artifact but I ill will be signing soon my residential emails but have no interest in signing my commercial folks unless there is a benefit thanks, Bill _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html