Dave CROCKER wrote: > > > Jim Fenton wrote: >> It's fairly easy to demonstrate interoperability of protocols, but >> usefulness is much more difficult. DKIM is an infrastructure protocol, >> designed to provide a basis for other mechanisms, such as domain-based >> reputation, to operate. Those other mechanisms are as yet nascent; how >> does one judge usefulness at this point? > > > Jim, > > This appears to be imposing criteria that go considerably beyond the > IETF's requirements for Draft. > > From the standpoing of IESG process, how is this legitimate?
Good question. I wasn't proposing that we judge usefulness at all; I was responding to suggestions from others that measuring usefulness be included in the charter. -Jim _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
