--On 30 April 2010 01:06:15 +0000 John Levine <jo...@iecc.com> wrote:
> I just don't see how you can simultaneously say "throw away unsigned > mail" and "don't throw away unsigned mail if a list says it used to be > signed" unless you have some way to identify trustworthy lists. But > once you know that a list is trustworthy, why wouldn't you just accept > all its mail? I just don't see a plausible scenario where you you > know you trust the list but still want to accept or reject mail based > on assertions the list itself makes. > How about you trust the list, and it says the inbound message wasn't signed? The list has left the value judgement to the recipient. -- Ian Eiloart IT Services, University of Sussex 01273-873148 x3148 For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/ _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
