On 4/29/10 10:34 AM, "Michael Thomas" <[email protected]> scribbled: > On 04/29/2010 10:23 AM, Al Iverson wrote: >> As John Levine mentioned previously, your own posts to this list fail >> authentication and end up in many of our spam folders because of >> Paypal's SPF policy. I'm not against strong authentication policies -- >> but I'm wondering how you personally expect to be able to post to >> mailing lists without acceptance of this proposal? The status quo >> interferes with your ability currently, and broader adoption of >> authentication on the receiving side will only make it worse. > > The solution to a misconfigured SPF/ADSP record is for every receiver to > patch it up post-hoc? That makes absolutely no sense.
I must have missed it. What exactly does PayPal have misconfigured? Off-list is fine. -Jot -- Jot Powers [email protected] _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
