On Apr 30, 2010, at 1:38 PM, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > On 30/Apr/10 12:13, Ian Eiloart wrote: >> --On 28 April 2010 11:02:53 -0400 "MH Michael Hammer (5304)" >> <mham...@ag.com> wrote: >>> 2) One possible recommendation to list managers is that if a message to >>> the list is DKIM signed AND has an ADSP discardable policy AND the >>> signature cannot be maintained intact then the list should bounce the >>> message. >> >> +1 > > +1, an additional reason is that the author might have a clever DKIM > configuration, but just forgot to add "[ietf-dkim]" in front of the > subject of a new message. A bounce easily prompts for such correction. >
So that's another "vote" for option #4 (per the previous post trying to summarize the various options). BTW, where is this mail list publicly archived? (Next time I'm referring to a previous message I'll just include the URL to the post.) _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
