> Apart from ADSP rules, a broken signature must be treated as if there was no > signature at all. That in itself is not the problem. The problem with broken > signatures is that people will not buy into a technology (DKIM) if it will > not cover a significant part of their e-mail.
Of course. That's why MLMs should sign their mail, or equvalently the MSA they use should sign it. Problem solved, right? Free bonus: MLMs can sign the list mail even if the contributor didn't sign it. R's, John _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
