On 5/10/2010 2:28 PM, J.D. Falk wrote: > I think we could write normative language for what MLM software MUST NOT do > if it wants to pass DKIM-signed messages through unscathed.
Seems an odd thing to make normative, since all that is entailed is not breaking the signature, and the details of what goes into a signature are in the base DKIM signing spec. This actually winds up arguing for not worrying about the subtleties or niceties of normative language and instead just trying to provide discussion that is largely tutorial. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html