--On 10 May 2010 15:24:05 -0700 Steve Atkins <st...@wordtothewise.com> wrote:
> > On May 10, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > >> I’ve posted an individual submission draft that attempts to capture >> some of the consensus and some appropriate guidance around the use of >> DKIM in the context of mailing lists. I don’t propose that it’s >> final at all, but merely an anchor point for further discussion. >> >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kucherawy-dkim-lists/ > > Looks good. > > What's described there as an "authoring" mailing list manager isn't > really what I think of as a mailing list, and there's not that much to > say about it compared with the other sorts discussed. If it simplified > things it could be dropped without affecting the rest of the document, I > think. It's just another MSA, isn't it? Granted, one can often use an MLM for announcements only, but those would not fit into this category for purposes of the present discussion. I agree that this type of list manager isn't really relevant here, because it's not going to break any DKIM signatures. However, a statement to that effect would not hurt. And, it should be made clear that we're NOT talking about a "resending MLM" used as an announcement list (ie, with a very restricted list of permitted senders). > Cheers, > Steve > > > _______________________________________________ > NOTE WELL: This list operates according to > http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html -- Ian Eiloart IT Services, University of Sussex 01273-873148 x3148 For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/ _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
