>> And in any event, even if your assertion were true, so what? Our >> working assumption is that receivers will use valid DKIM signatures to >> whitelist mail from signers they like. How does it matter whether the >> signer happened to be a related to a list?
>If I'm a consumer of your list of domains that you're convinced sign >all their mail and I get an unsigned message from one of them, I'm >bound to be extra suspicious of that. "Oooh, it came from a mailing >list so I don't care" isn't the most likely response. I can't speak for other hypothetical lists of domains who sign all their mail, but the domains on my small but real drop list send no mail to mailing lists. I suppose it is hypothetically possible that there would be well run lists that would leak the occasional forged message from some ESP domains. But since that happens now basically never, I don't see any reason to spend any effort on it. Maybe you'd look at the list's signature and deliver it, maybe you'd look at the drop list and drop it, leading to one filtering error in umpteen million messages. If that's the worst problem you have with your mail filtering, you don't have any problems. R's, John _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
