On Aug 1, 2010, at 3:43 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > This makes at least the third time this has been suggested by someone. I > believe (though I'm willing to be corrected) that the draft should therefore > cover this possibility and either advocate it or explain why it's a bad idea. > The latter is acceptable; the material is on-topic, and we're trying to > relay implementation advice and experience here, so it can be a cookbook of > what to do as well as what not to do. > > Comments? And if you agree, your rationales in either direction? (I'll take > Daniel's text at that link into account.)
Weighing in a bit late...I think this approach should be included in the document. It's an entirely reasonable approach with some existing implementations, and it may not be as surprising to end users as it is to those of us who read raw email headers daily before breakfast. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
