On 08/19/2010 10:29 AM, J.D. Falk wrote: > On Aug 18, 2010, at 6:59 PM, Daniel Black wrote: >> * BUT otherwise its useless in its current state. > > Useless for which purpose? From the rest of the message it sounds like > you're primarily thinking about discussion-type mailing lists, which -- while > a popular topic here recently -- are not the only kind of mail DKIM can be > applied to. > > http://www.maawg.org/sites/maawg/files/news/MAAWG_Email_Authentication_Paper_2008-07.pdf > is a very good overview of the theory and applicability of message sender > authentication, though some of the terms may be a couple years out of date. > I'd suggest starting there.
If mailing lists were put out of business by DKIM/ADSP would anybody even notice? Or care? Mailing lists are from a bygone era, even if we are its fossilized remains. Mike, not that DKIM would be able to do that, of course _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
